I can't remember what those pros and cons are, but I've read about them before. That's a nice article! My understanding is that because of the nature of how the DSP is handled in different ways, there are pros and cons in terms of what happens to the sound with both approaches. Multiband compressors tend to have more controls, dynamic EQ's tend to have less but are more convenient to fix small frequency or resonance problems and can sound more transparent due to the ability of having dynamic bell cuts/boosts.
#UAD PRECISION MULTIBAND VS FABFILTER MB FULL#
Also technically less phase shift because the signal isn't being split by full on filters. The dynamic EQ listens to the band "solo'd" and then reacts based on how loud the signal is, also with attack/release, etc.ĭynamic EQ's can be more transparents, especially when it comes to notching individual resonances. Hey so the only difference is that a multiband compressor splits the signal with high pass and low pass filters, and then these individual bands work like a normal compressor, so if you solo these bands, it's like if they were individual compressors, controlled by their own individual attack/release, etc.Ī dynamic EQ is very similar except that instead of being split by high pass and low pass filters, it's a band that is being automated.